THE FORGOTTEN “N” WORD IN THE BIBLE
By William Dwight McKissic, Sr.
The NFL is currently discussing penalizing players who use the “N” word during a game. Two White NFL players, Riley Cooper and Incognito, have been recorded using the “N” word as a slur directed toward African American males. Black NFL players reportedly commonly use the term during games in a myriad of context, some affirmative and some pejorative. Recently, an Anglo female student at the high school in Texas where my daughter teaches—at a school-wide sanctioned event, across a microphone—made reference to all the “high yellow ‘N’s,’” in the audience. The mixed-race audience, predominately Black, screamed with laughter and approval at her remark.
The word “Christian” was originated by non-Christians, and used initially as a term of derision. However, Christians adopted the term and transformed it into a term of identification with our Lord, and as a testimony.
The “N” word had a similar transformative history. This word was originally used by White persons as a term of derision and disrespect toward Blacks. Blacks adopted the term and transformed it into a term of endearment; a term of respect; and a term of brotherhood. One of the highest compliments one Black Male can give to another Black Male is to call him a “Big N.” The “N” word was and is also used toward Blacks as a term of derision and disrespect. Context determines meaning. It is seldom, if ever, misunderstood when talking Black to Black. But, until recently, it was always a closeted term, never used in mixed company.
The hip-hop rap generation over the past 20-25 years have radically, and perhaps, irreversibly, changed the use of the “N” word, from private use to public use. They started using the term on public air waves 25 or so years ago. They sold records by the millions; yes, to White persons as well, where the “N” word was used prominently. The lyrics of their songs, including and featuring the “N” word were printed in the record label jackets. This, in a sense, gave permission to Whites and others to use the term. How could Whites attend the same rap concert; listen to the same rap lyrics; buy the same rap music; read the same rap lyrics; and not be allowed to say, read, sing, etc., the same “N” word? It is unfortunate that the church has not had this kind of inter-racial and inter-cultural impact on the fusion of Black and White culture as the rappers have had.
The public use and cross racial use of the “N” word has caused a generational divide in the Black community. Ray Lewis disapproves of Incognito’s use of the “N” word. I attended and spoke at a Men’s conference in Maryland last year where Lewis said, that would not have been tolerated in his locker room. Yet, Mike Pouncey, an African-American Center for the Dolphins, approves of Incognito’s use of the “N” word. The difference between how Ray Lewis and Mike Pouncey, both African Americans, view this differently has everything to do with their ages—about a 15-year difference.
I am 57 years old. There were two times you were expected to physically fight when I was a boy. (1) If someone talked about your mother. It was called for some reason—“playing the dozens.” If that took place, a fight was on. (2) If a White person called you the “N” word. If you didn’t fight in those two instances, you lost any and all respect among your peers. You may have even lost your parents respect, if you didn’t fight in this scenario. Most parents did not approve of fighting for “playing the dozen,” but, they were quietly supportive or understanding if you fought a White person for calling you the “N” word.
Fast forward to today and we have a generation that’s allowing White persons to call them by some derivative of the “N” word, or the “N” word itself. This is quite disgusting.
The changing use and acceptance of the “N” word documents the fact that the “N” word has a complex, convoluted, controversial and ever-changing history.
We will discover that because the “N” word has historically been misconstrued and mis-associated with other words that begin with the letter “N,” it has caused us to overlook, under emphasize or downright ignore another “N” word, that’s actually recorded in the Bible—the word “Niger” (Acts 13:1).
The word “Niger” has absolutely no etymological or social relationship to the “N” word that’s commonly used today. Yet, in a Bible study class that I was conducting recently, I discovered that several persons viewed the biblical Acts 13:1 “N” word, as synonymous with the controversial “N” word. They even pronounced it the same.
Therefore, I felt inspired to write this article on the “N” word in the Bible, and to clarify and distinguish between these two unrelated terms. Furthermore, I want to discuss the word “Negro,” a derivative of the word “Niger” and its non-association with the controversial “N” word. The “N” word in the Bible is a positive and affirming word that connects descendants of Africa with prominence, productivity, and a place at the welcome table in the Father’s Kingdom.
The Biblical “N” word Provides, Proof Positive that God loves persons of African Descent and He included us in His plan of redemption. Acts 13:1 reads:
“Now in the church that was at Antioch there were certain prophets and teachers: Barnabas, Simeon who was called Niger, Lucius of Cyrene, Manaen who had been brought up with Herod the tetrarch, and Saul.”
“Simeon who was called Niger” was a prophet, teacher, and leader in the church at Antioch. The church at Antioch was the first Gentile congregation in history. The disciples were first called Christians at Antioch (Acts 11:26). Luke found it necessary to place it in the inerrant, infallible, and eternal word of God that two men of African descent were leaders in the early church. “Lucius of Cyrene” was also mentioned by name and country of origin. Cyrene was located in North Africa. According to David Adamo, Ph.D. in OT, Baylor University, in his book Africa and Africans in the New Testament (P.52), “The city of Cyrene was in the area where Libya is today and was originally populated by black people in history before the advent and the domination of European people.”
“The word Niger occurs only once in the New Testament, namely in Acts 13:1. Adamo argues that Niger is a Latin word, which means ‘black.’ In the New Testament, the words Ethiopia and Niger were used as the equivalent of the Old Testament word Cush. The Hebrew word, Cush, in the Old Testament means black, and in the Septuagint it was translated Ethiopia, and that also means black. Roman literature described swarthy, or dark-skinned people as Niger among the various terms employed. The people in this category are Africans, including the Egyptians, Libyans, Moors, some Indians and certain persons of mixed parentage with black and white. In Latin, the adjective most frequently used for the Ethiopians who are of black skinned is Niger as equivalence of Ethiopia,” according to Adamo (p. 32) .
“The legendary Ethiopian king called Memnon (600 BCE) who fought in the Trojan War of Troy was referred to sometimes as Memnon aethiops, and other times as Memnon Niger” (Adamo, p. 33).
“In the New Testament, the Greek word Niger was transliterated “Niger” respectively by The King James Version. The Revised Standard Version, The American Standard Version, the New International, and Jerusalem Bible Versions also translated it “Niger.” The Good News Bible, The New American Standard Version, The Living Bible and the New Living Translation, translated it “the black person.” This is highly commendable” (Adamo, p. 33).
According to J.A. Rogers, a distinguished Black scholar, the term “Negro” is a derivative of the word “Niger,” and simply means “black.” Rogers further maintains that contrary to popular scholarly opinion, the word Niger was not originally a Latin or European term, but an African term originating from a native African language. There is a Niger River in Africa and countries called Niger and Nigeria. Adewunni Williams, a native Nigerian that I’m acquainted with reports that in his native Nigerian tongue, the word “Inago” is somewhat similar in spelling and sound to the word “Negro,” and is identical in meaning—“Black Man.” According to Rogers, there was nothing inherently negative with reference to Black people within the etymology or original usage of the words “Niger” or “Negro.” The Europeans borrowed these terms from Africans. The terms “Niger,” “Negro,” “Black,” and “African,” are etymologically the same—originating from African language and meaning “Black” or “dark.”
There is absolutely no etymological connection between the African words “Niger” and “Negro” and the English words “niggard” or “nigger.” Unfortunately, these words have been misconstrued and mis-pronounced. The Ethiopians and the Egyptians used the word “Negus” to refer to kings and royalty. The English words “niggard” and “nigger” have absolutely nothing to do with race. These words described a stingy person regardless of their race.
So what is the proper name designation for persons of African descent here in America? In the final analysis, each person must decide for himself or herself. One must choose the term that is least offensive to his or her sensibilities. There is a context in which I proudly answer to all of these terms (African-American, Black and Negro). Psychologically and emotionally, I am extremely proud of my African descent. Nationally and culturally, I am proud to be an American. The word “Black” etymologically and ethnically connects me with the ancient Cushites (Ethiopians), Sumerians (Blackheads) and Hamites (Egyptians), who were the prominent people of ancient history. My complexion is literally “black”, of which I’m also proud.
I also proudly answer to the term “Negro.” Why? Because I understand the historicity and etymology of the term. The appellation Negro (Niger) encompasses my African roots and biblical roots (Acts 13:1) and ethnologically links me with dark-skinned persons throughout the globe who do not necessarily trace their roots back to Africa. Finally, if the word Negro was good enough for Dr. WE.B. Du Bois, the first Black to graduate with a Ph.D. in history from Harvard University; and the word Negro was good enough for Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., who used the term often and proudly; and if the word Niger or Negro was good enough for the pages of Scripture (Acts 13:1), then the word Negro is good enough for me. Historically and ethnically, I am proud to be a Negro. However, I repeat: There is a context in which I proudly answer to all of these terms. An older Negro preacher in Arkansas was known for saying that Black is an adjective and Negro is a noun; and he would rather be a noun than an adjective.
The biblical “N” word provides positive proof that persons of African descent were committed to the triune God, before Mohammed and Islam had come into existence. The “N” word in history was an English term that originally had absolutely nothing to do with one’s race, but with one’s attitude and disposition—regardless of race. This word was transformed into a racial insult directed toward Black people. It is now time that all people, including, Blacks of all ages, in all context consider the disallowance and non-use of this word. Now that society is integrated in ways that it was not when this word was a popular closeted term, we must accept the fact that there cannot be a word that is off limits to one set of people, but can be used by another and they are all together at the same place. The time has come to have a funeral and bury the English “N” word while maintaining the Biblical “N” word. The pronunciation, spelling and the definition of those two words are different and should not be confused. Our young people should immediately stop affirming the abuse and misuse of the English “N” word.
Wm. Dwight McKissic, Sr. 
February 27, 2014 at 7:19 pm
Where I’ve had continued contact with Black men & women in my daily life, I’ve cleared with them how they’d rather I refer to their race, should some external circumstance require a discussion of race. They’ve all said “Black” is fine with them. My audiologist even told me that was “the term my people chose, many years ago”.
I think I recall that being on the news.
The one term I don’t like is “African American”; to do so indicates that there are different classes of American. I tell folks, as I’d say to my friend Dwight McKissic, that you’re every bit as much American as I am.
And, really, for the Christian, shouldn’t one’s concern be the other person, anyway?
February 27, 2014 at 10:40 pm
Bob,
Your wisdom is amazing. You bring a perspective to blog comments that quite unique. You can say much with few words as well as any one I know. What respect you showed by asking, what do you prefer to be called? Thanks for commenting here. You are loved, valued, appreciated, and respected here. Be encouraged.
February 28, 2014 at 3:45 pm
[…] here to read […]
February 28, 2014 at 9:08 pm
How did the Black African American community come about seeing and using the n-word as a term of endearment? Just what is the true significance of their use of the word n**ga? The answers to these questions and much more are revealed in the following publication which was released on February 10, 2014:
https://www.createspace.com/4655015
April 30, 2014 at 6:49 pm
as much as I respect the academic focus that is presented in this writing, as a white Anglican descendant of early Virgina settlers, it is important to remeind the contemporary world that Latin was a primary language amongst the educated, ergo Latin verbage was common in colonial America. The slave trade insituted by the Dutch brought the black man to America, and with it the latin term,”niger.”
May 20, 2014 at 3:33 am
If you are going for best contents like myself, just visit this website
every day as it presents quality contents, thanks
July 20, 2015 at 5:35 am
Brother Elijah at Israel church of Jesus has a wonderful teaching on subject. Israel IS a black people but descendents of Shem not Ham.
December 23, 2015 at 5:25 am
Good piece. Particularly liked your referencing of J. A. Rogers. Often overlooked & forgotten scholar. When I first researched the word back in the ’80’s – he was my go-to authority, which naturally opened up my appetite to many of his other writings. Ase!
February 28, 2017 at 9:09 pm
Niger, or Neeger means Christian or Black. The Romans were calling the Christians this word, because the first Christians were Black Israelites scattered.
◄ 3526. Niger ►
Strong’s Concordance
Niger: Niger, a Christian
Original Word: Νίγερ, ὁ
Part of Speech: Proper Noun, Indeclinable
Transliteration: Niger
Phonetic Spelling: (neeg’-er)
Short Definition: Niger
Definition: Niger, a proper name.
NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
of Latin origin (dark in color)
Definition
Niger, a Christian
NASB Translation
Niger
July 8, 2017 at 4:23 pm
In the book of Ephesians the mystery revealed was the inclusion of all people. The walls of partiality was no more. Culture, race, etc was not a factor in being a Christian, it is now the new life in the spirit unto God that connects us all. This Niger word is just a mere physical description of a person which has nothing to do with the true Christian, the new man that houses the spirit of God.
November 16, 2017 at 12:02 am
Lmao. So your telling me that the “black” Judah prophets in the Bible weren’t know that they were black and use the Niger word that biblical meaning is “black” by accident became the word “nigger” lmao your smoking crack.
February 27, 2018 at 9:38 am
Sir, before you get on a respected man of God’s page being disrespectful, Please do Us a favor and you Avoid from “smoking crack” then maybe your remedial statement can make some sense!!
December 30, 2017 at 10:20 pm
This whole article is based on totally flawed information, and misinterpretation of scripture. The word Niger and the word Ethiopia had nothing to do with skin color, it had to do with the “REGION” that the people referred to as Niger came from! In biblical times Ethiopia was NOT the small country that it is today, but a HUGE geographical region, the southern portion of what was later (several thousand years later) named Africa.
Nowhere in the scriptures is there ANY reference to “race(s)” of people because all of the peoples were caucasian, with slight variations in color from the environment they were exposed to. References in scripture referred to ethnicity (Greek, Israelite, gentiles, etc.) and nationality/region (Cush, Ethiopian, Philistines, etc.).
The Bible has more than 135 verses that tell us who negros were, but that word itself had not been created yet; the word negro didn’t appear until just a few hundred years ago. AND prior to that negros were not referred to as humans or men, because God called them “Behemah”. The total ignorance of today’s clergy who have accepted the lies of satan being taught by man and causing everyone to accept the negro as being in the ancestry of man!
The name Adam, means ruddy skin or skin that blushes. All of the “races” of man have skin that shows redness or blushes EXCEPT the negro; negro skin is biologically different than ALL other peoples – they have a PERMANENT layer of melanin in their skin that prevents seeing the blood.
[There are eight different Hebrew and Greek words, behemah, b’iyr, ziyz, chay, cheyva’, trephah, nephesh, and ktenos, are all translated into the one English word “beast”, but they each have different meanings in the original Hebrew and Greek languages which were lost in the translation into English.
The Hebrew word “behemah” [#929] is translated 136 times as “beasts” and 57 times as “cattle”. It describes “beasts” who can cry mightily to God, who can turn away from evil, who wear sackcloth, who are circumcised, who can lie down with a woman to have sex with her, who have a conscience, who are put to death for violating God’s Law, who have possessions which can be sold or redeemed, who hold authority which can be taken away, who have feet and hands, who are inhabitants of cities, who God threatens to crossbreed with Israelites and Judahites, who can be hired, who are kept in tents, and who have boils on their bodies, none of which any four legged animal on the planet is capable of.
Only homo sapiens have such traits and capabilities, even to this day. This Scripture is proof that there are species of humans who are not of “Adam” [read: “ruddy” or to blush]. Thus the word “behemah” can describe only homo sapiens who are not of the Adamic [read: Caucasoid] race but who do have similar but certainly not equal physical and intellectual traits.]
God/Jesus warned us that MANY WILL BE DECEIVED, and the acceptance of negros as sexual partners is an abomination to God; just as “man” has accepted women in in authority over men, and not homosexuality! In one parable God destroyed a city and stated he would kill ALL of man and beast (behemah), he didn’t say cattle, fowl of the air, or creepy things – “beast” is specific!
This whole lie that negros are in the ancestry of man came about with the creation of “the theory of evolution” which has been used to eliminate God! It has been only in the last 200 years that it has become “acceptable” for negros and whites to mix, prior to that there are no cultures that allowed it!
http://fathersmanifesto.net/behemah.htm
If you believe this to be wrong then it is very simple – Explain WHAT “beasts”:
1) can cry mightily to God
2) can turn away from evil
3) can wear sackcloth
4) are circumcised
5) can lie down with a woman to have sex with her
6) have a conscience
7) are put to death for violating God’s Law
8) have possessions which can be sold or redeemed
9) hold authority which can be taken away
10) have feet and hands
11) are inhabitants of cities
12) God threatens to crossbreed with Israelites and Judahites
13) can be hired
14) are kept in tents
15) have boils on their bodies
December 31, 2017 at 4:29 pm
You didn’t read the scriptures carefully enough… Cause if you did, you would’ve realized you are Satan.
March 10, 2018 at 12:12 pm
Correction, you are Satan. Satan is a deceiver which is what you are. I do agree with the fact that this William is confused. One thing that you should understand “if you read the scripture carefully” is that Ham which we call the father of black races look just like his brother Shem (which is where the bloodline of Israel come from). Ham is the father of Egyptians and Ethiopian, and other black races but not the Negros. Follow the bloodline in Genesis 10. We also know this to be true (the Egyptians looking like Israelites) because Moses (being an Israelite) looked just like the Egyptians. This is why Pharaoh sister was able to claim Moses as her own child without anyone knowing that it wasn’t her child because they looked just alike in color. In addition, one of the miracles God gave to Moses to do was to put his arm in his bosom (Exodus 4:6). When Moses pulled his arm out it was white as snow. They he told him to put his arm back in his bosom and when he pulled it out it was back to its normal color (which is black). The question for you is how could he turn my his arm white if it was already white? Would that be a miracle if my arm look the same as it already did? What about Paul being mistaken as an Egyptian (Acts 21:37) and Paul had to correct them and tell them that he is a Jew. What about Genesis 42 when Joseph (Israelites son of Jacob) was raised in Egypt when his brothers sold him as a child to the Egyptians as a slave. When they were older (his brothers) and went to Egypt during the drought to get food, they could identify him but he knew them. He blended in with the rest of the people. Don’t you think if he was white among all of those black Egyptians he would stand out like a sore thumb? I said all that to say this, the so called African Americans homeland is not Africans, they are the Israelites according to the curses which is how you identify his people. Now the question we should all have is who are the people in Israel that call themselves Jews? They are who the Bible say they are in Revelations 2:9 and Revelations 3:9 just to give a few verses.
February 27, 2018 at 9:39 am
You are the true example of what the word “nigger” means…. Ignorant! Can you as a Caucasian male or “Adamic” descendent as you referred to it(lol) mate with a Caucasian female and have a dark skinned child? No! Can I as an African descendent mate with a female of African descent and have a very light skinned child? Yes! So it sounds like a person of African descent would be more likely to be the cause of the diversity that takes place today opposed to you.
But keep talking, because the more you try and explain your foolish babbling the more you make what Pastor Mckissic has said credible.
June 17, 2018 at 6:45 pm
Find me the people and the country that carry the exact same name, and you will find the name of the creator (Father) Daniel 9: 20b. Find the most disrespected word in the world directed at a human being as a slur, then you will find the name of the creator (Father) Isaiah 52: 4 – 5. The biblical scholars know the truth, yet they beat around the bush to keep the people of the book from awakening; but NEEGER (NGR) or NIGER will act because of His name Ezekiel 36: 20 – 23.
October 31, 2018 at 1:36 pm
The person that wrote this about so-called blacks using the N-word as respect is completely wrong…How dare you put this mess on the web…
December 5, 2021 at 3:14 pm
Some beings, ESPECIALLY caucasians ,have Reckless Disrespect and Disregard for TRUTH and TOTAL Disregard for LIFE. They are “Uncomfortable” with TRUTH…beings with huge egos are Allergic to TRUTH. “The Greatest impurity, the MOST negative energy is Ignorance” D Mittra. “They profess to know GOD, but By their Actions they DENY Him.
They are Detestable, Disobedient and Unfit for ANY good deed. Titus 1:16 IF we say we have fellowship with Him Yet walk in the darkness, we LIE and do NOT PRACTICE TRUTH. 1 John 1:6 “You WILL Know the TRUTH and the TRUTH Will SET You FREE. 8:32 The ENTIRE Bible is for the ISRAELITES, those called, “African American/Negro/Colored” whose Heritage was STOLEN by caucasians, John 10:10, Romans 9:12, 13; Psalms 83:1-8; Habukkuk 2:5-10; Psalms 2:1-12 True worshipers WILL Worship The TRUE GOD in Spirit and TRUTH, for the Father WANTS people like these to Worship HIM. GOD is SPIRIT, His worshipers MUST Worship HIM in Spirit and TRUTH.” JOHN 4:23,24
caucasians are ALLERGIC to TRUTH and Will Receive FULL RECOMPENSE FOR your Trickery and Treachery. Psalms 58:1-6;
Revelation 6:10; Genesis 4:10 caucasian have POLLUTED ALL
the Earth with BLOOD. Numbers 35:33 They want the worship of ALL people for themselves That ONLY Belong to the TRUE GOD, YAH!
March 9, 2019 at 2:49 am
It’s the craziest thing when you see the “beast of the field” negro talk about How old the Bible is a history of the black man, or when they talk about being the biblical Hebrew Israelites. The most insane remark out there is the negroes are God‘s chosen people. Then you have a guy like this author who says they are part of God’s plan blah blah blah. Negroes are definitely part of the plan but they’re clueless as to what that part is. I did a brief overview of the previous comments and I have to say there are truly some very ignorant Negroes leaving comments about things they don’t understand. The Negro, is always learning but never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. You can find the plan for the Negroes is in Genesis and in Matthew. I dare the Negro with all that attitude to read the following.
Now you will learn that color and race absolutely do make a difference! It’s past time to stop hiding the true identity of the negroes. Romans 9:22 The “beasts of the field” (the negroes) are The Alpha & The Omega’s “vessels of wrath” prepared for destruction! When you compare Genesis 1:24-27 the “beast of the field” negroes and “the races” to Genesis 2:7-22 the new Adamic [Caucasian Hebrew Israelite-Greek race], only the new Adamic [Caucasian Hebrew Israelite-Greek race] have a “spirit” (His breath) and a “living soul” so only the new [Adamic Caucasian Hebrew Israelite-Greek race] will be Blessed with redemption, salvation, and eternal life with Jesus Christ.
Moses 7:7-8, Shemites shall slay them that they shall utterly be destroyed; and the people of Cain shall divide themselves in the land, and the land shall be barren and unfruitful, and none other people shall dwell there but the people of Cain; the Canaanites. 8 For behold, the Lord shall curse the land with much heat, and the barrenness thereof shall go forth forever; and there was a blackness came upon all the children of Cain, that they were despised among all people, (still are today). MOSES CHAPTER 7:22 and Enoch also beheld the residue of the people which were the sons of Adam [the man] and they were a mixture of all the seed of Adam [the man] save it was the seed of Cain, for the seed line of Cain were the “negroes” and had no place among [white men]. (Genesis 7-22) Moses named the negro the “beasts of the field.” The black male “beast” and the black female “behemah” or the (living creatures), (cattlea land animal, a domesticated animal, a higher form of an ape, sub-human, a beast. Is it not strange that devil and ape should have the same root?
Abraham confirms the negroes are the descendants of Cain. Abraham 1:21-24 Now this king of Egypt was a descendant from the loins of Ham, and was a partaker of the blood of the serpent seed (negroes) Cainites, Canaanites by birth. 22 From this descent sprang all the Egyptians, and thus the blood of the serpent seed Canaanites (the descendants of Cain) was preserved in the land. 23 The land of Egypt being first discovered by a woman, who was the daughter of Ham, and the daughter of Egyptus, which in the Chaldean signifies Egypt, which signifies that which is forbidden; 24 When this woman discovered the land, it was under water, (Noah’s flood) who afterward settled her sons (negroes) in it; and thus, from Ham, sprang that race (black Antichrist negroes) which preserved the curse in the land.
No unsaved ***Israelite*** will ever enter the Promised Land. The LORD God JESUS made a covenant with Adamic Abraham and promised “only” his seed through Adamic Isaac and Adamic Jacob/Israel [the man] in Genesis 17:8. Who is Abrahams seed? This is a singular seed line, not all seed lines. This is the Adamic [new white race], (Genesis 7:22). Racial INTEGRATION and INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE is a sin. Speaking to Adamic Israel about the sons of Canaan, (negroes) God said, “Neither shalt thou make marriages with them: (negroes and other races) thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. Since God doesn’t change (Mal.3:6) and Jesus Christ is “the same yesterday, and today, and forever” (Heb.13:8), it is safe to say this law is not abolished. God only dwells “in the tents of Shem” (Gen. 9:27). The Eternal is a “God of Shem” (9:26) and, more fully, is “the God of Adamic Abraham, the God of Adamic Isaac, and the God of Adamic Jacob/Israel [the mam]. (Ex. 3:15). This is God’s name “forever” and “unto all generations” (v.15). All other nations and races are cut off from God! They are ruled by demons (Dan. 10:20; Ps. 106:35-37) and by Satan (Matt. 4:8-9; 2 Cor. 4:4).These pre-Adamites” were on the earth thousands and thousands of years before Adam [the man]. The Alpha & The Omega created with 4 types of flesh in Genesis 1 & 2. Not that HE needs it, but the apostle Paul “confirms” this in the New Testament. There is one kind of flesh for [men], [white men], another flesh of “beasts,” another flesh of “birds,” and another flesh of “fishes.” We know that the negro is not descended from Adam [the man], consequently not of the flesh of [man], so according to The Alpha & The Omega in the Old Testament, the negro belongs to one of the other three kinds of flesh. The flesh of “beasts.” Such a “beast” doesn’t have sufficient intellect to be morally responsible for his actions as the centuries have shown. What nation/tree/race/people in the Old Testament are referred to in such an insulting way? The actions of the nations/race/old world Egyptians are depicted as evil, and never accomplished anything without the help of the fallen angels. The nation/tree/race/grass are described as “vomit” ( Lev 18:28 ), a “drop in a bucket” and “dust on the scales” (Isa 40:15 ), and the source of slaves ( Lev 25:44 ).
All negroes and African blacks are the physical children of Gadre’El, the black devil, and they all have the mutated fallen angel/Nephilim DNA. The land (Africa) they left behind them was so desolate that no one traveled through it. It was The LORD God JESUS that allowed that lineage (serpent seed negroes) to be preserved to fulfill the role of the Beast/Antichrist. Mark 7:6 and Jesus said “Give not that which is Holy unto these “DOGS.” And when the Philistine looked about, and saw (ruddy white boy )David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance. And the Philistine (negro) said unto David, “Am I a “dog” that thou comest to me with staves? And the Philistine cursed David by his gods, (1 Samuel 17:42-43). He cursed Adamic Israelite David; how has that been for the negroes since? Life has been good for the negroes huh? Hell no, literally. You curse the Adamic Israelites, He, The LORD God JESUS curses you. Is it criminal to Christianize the swine? Of course, it’s an animal. Jesus cursed the swine with demons. You can’t separate salvation from one animal to the next for both are animals, non “HU-mans.” Salvation is not for animals. Then it is criminal to Christianize the negro for the Bible calls them beasts. It was JESUS The Holy Spirit that banned the negroes and the descendants of Ham from being in the priest line. [Man] lifted the ban that allowed the “beasts of the field,” negroes, Father Uncles to be ordained into the priesthood, not JESUS The Holy Spirit Just like the Roman Catholic Church moved the Sabbath from a Saturday to a Sunday, not JESUS The Holy Spirit. Mark 7:8 They worship Me in vain; they teach as doctrine the precepts of men.’ 8You have disregarded the commandment of God to keep the tradition of men.” 9He went on to say, “You neatly set aside the commandment of God to maintain your own tradition.…Zechariah 7:11 (NIV) 11 “But they refused to pay attention; stubbornly they turned their backs and covered their ears. 12 They made their hearts as hard as flint and would not listen to the law.
But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD they God; in it thou
shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy
manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle (Bahemah), nor thy
stranger that is within thy gates. – Ex. 20:10 (KJV)
…as we see, this verse seems to be referring only to people.
…Let neither man nor beast (Bahemah), herd nor flock, taste any
thing… – Jonah 3:7 (KJV)
…if we notice, humans and animals seemed to be grouped together.
Something truly strange is going on here, in regards to these verses. Could
these beasts, or bahemah, said to be created sometime around the time of
Adam, be other groups of human beings? Would that also mean that Adam
was not the father of everyone, here on earth? As we’ve seen in Untold
Garden of Eden, there could have been more than just Adam and Eve
working in the garden. These other groups of people have been referred to,
in the past, as the Pre-Adamites.
There were references to the beasts of the field and the fowl of the air
around this early time of Adam. The proper Hebrew words, translated in
beasts and fowl are chay and owph, respectively. So, based upon much of
the ancient written evidence, we could conclude that there could even have
been up to five different groups of people on the earth at this early time!
These are (in their original Hebrew):
– the “Chay (or beast) of the Field”
– the “Bahemah” (also translated as beast)
– the “Owph (or fowl) of the Air”
– the “Remes (or creeping thing) that Creepeth”
– the “Adam” (the Adamites – the group of people Adam belongs to)
Could these be actual names of actual groups of people, present since the
formation of Adam? They seem to continue to reappear, again and again,
throughout the King James Translation! If these groups were people,
indeed, then the Garden of Eden, and the entire world of Genesis, might
actually be able to take on a whole new look! As well, the interpretations
of many of the stories throughout the Bible could be able to take on a
whole new meaning!
Jesus Christ did not come for the redemption of (negroes) all the races of man only the Adamic [white Israel race], (Luke 1:68; Matthew 15:24; 18:11; Romans 11:26), and thus gives repentance and forgiveness of sins only to Adamic [white Israel], (Acts 5:31). 2 Timothy 3:16-17 the words of Scripture are “God breathed” or inspired. This implies that God is the source or origin of what is recorded in Scripture. God, through the Holy Spirit, used human authors to write what He revealed in the Bible.
Here is the plan for the negroes:
The Parable of the Tares (negroes) Explained
Matthew 15:24 He answered and said, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Galatians 3:28-29 (is about seed line-seed line of Adamic [man]). “There is neither Jew nor Gentile” translates to “There is neither Hebrew Israelite nor Greek/Hellenistic/same culture/kinsmen.” This is about “The Father’s seed line,” not about all “seed lines” all over the world. There is no such thing as a black Hebrew Israelite. Blacks/negroes are pre-Adamites. We are not of the same “seed line.” We [the Caucasian Israel race] are the “seed line of Jesus The Father, our LORD God.” Blacks/negroes are the “seed line” of their father, the dark lord Gadre’El. This is the Biblical truth.
Matthew 13:28-30 The servants said to Him, ‘Do you want us then to go and gather them (negroes/half breeds/Jews) up?’ 29 But he said, ‘No, lest while you gather up the tares (negroes/half Breeds/Jews) you also uproot the (100% pure Adamites) wheat with them. 30 Let both grow together until the harvest, and at the time of harvest (2nd coming) (Rapture is for the 100% Adamites) I will say to the reapers, “First gather together the tares (negroes/half breeds/Jews) and bind them in bundles to burn them, but gather the wheat (100% pure Adamites) into my barn.”
Matthew 13:41-43 The Son of Man will send out His angels, and they will gather out of His kingdom all things that offend, (amalgamated) and those who practice lawlessness, (MISCEGENATION) 42 and will cast them into the furnace of fire. There will be wailing and gnashing of teeth. 43 Then the righteous (100% pure Adamic seed line) will shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. He who has ears to hear, let him hear!
December 5, 2021 at 2:28 pm
Some beings, ESPECIALLY caucasians ,have Reckless Disrespect and Disregard for TRUTH and TOTAL Disregard for LIFE. They are “Uncomfortable” with TRUTH. Some humans with huge egos are Allergic to Truth and have a Reckless Disrespect and Disregard for LIFE.
Roman 9:12, 13
“For you are the children of your father the devil and you love to do the evil things he does. He was a murderer From The Beginning. He has Always Hated TRUTH, because there is No Truth in him. When he lies,
it is Consistent with his character; for he is a liar and the father of lies. John 8:44, John 10:10
July 14, 2022 at 12:54 pm
You have obviously been handed over to great delusion. We are the lambs of the earth slaughtered before the world. Sacrificed and hung on trees. Jesus became the curse himself. Took on all the worlds hatred. As a black . Even wrote over the head of the cross. Nigger of the Jews. To mock him. Stop smoking crack . Your like evil step children instead. The word nigger was invented at the cross. The word negus goes back to Solomons day.
May 23, 2023 at 11:50 am
You will be especially surprised on Judgment Day, the Day when all works and words will be judged and ALL people will answer to the JUDGE-Jesus Christ: some to everlasting life and some to eternal damnation. Your post is filled with words from your father, the devil, NO FRUIT, bitter, rotten, dead, unclean and unholy!!! May God have mercy on your soul.
May 23, 2023 at 11:52 am
My reply was for Stan.
August 28, 2023 at 6:57 pm
“Niger” is the Latin word for “BLACK”, as in “NIGERia”, from whence derived “NIGGER”. It’s just been “anglicized” with an extra “g”, that’s all. REMEMBER, Lucius NIGER was from Cyrenaica in AFRICA, as was his kinsman Simon.
September 10, 2023 at 8:30 pm
Wow! Now I see how white people interpret the Bible and can have so much hatred in their hearts. I guess we all will see when Judgement Day comes whose names will be written in the Lamb’s Book of Life, until then judge not lest ye be judged. May God have mercy on your soul.
February 10, 2021 at 7:47 am
Niger and Nigger is two different words so this article is BS!
July 14, 2022 at 12:38 pm
Exactly. If you go to goggle nigger the pronunciation spelling of the word is Niger. Lol this article is written by a agent.
December 5, 2021 at 2:19 pm
The edomites/caucasians/oppressors have used the Stupidity and Ignorance of so called, ‘rappers/entertainers’ as messengers of hate and self hate, Using
‘nigger’ in whatever form, as a NEGATIVE TOOL, a Tool of oppression.
“There is Nothing More dangerous than sincere ignorance and
‘conscientious stupidity'” Martin Luther King Jr.
“The Greatest impurity, the MOST Negative energy is Ignorance” D Mittra.
July 14, 2022 at 12:36 pm
Where did the word nigger come from then. Because it’s younger then the word Niger. Add a (g) that’s all. Tell me?
May 23, 2023 at 11:43 am
You should ask those who wrote the dictionary.
January 18, 2023 at 12:29 pm
Now THAT is amazing.
May 23, 2023 at 11:41 am
Thank you for providing this and enlightening us to these biblical truths. I really loved the historical facts and information you provided. One thing, I doubt Dr. Martin Luther King and Dr. W.E.B DuBois would embrace being called a Negro today 2023 but I could be wrong. I am 56 and my mother is 90 and she does not and will not respond to the word Negro today. God bless you, in Christ Jesus!
June 16, 2023 at 12:42 pm
Excuse me sir. I can tell that this must have been written by a Edomite descendant or a misguided man of COLOUR.
The word Niger stands for black. White man(red man) didn’t have proper grammar skills so they reverted to what flowed freely off their tongues with tout thinking! They didn’t know vowels; a-e-I-o-u-&-sometimes Y!